Zimbabwe: Exclosure

It’s been seven years since Cecil’s death. The handsome, black-maned lion was shot right outside his home, Hwange National Park in Western Zimbabwe, by a trophy hunting American tourist. The dentist from Minnesota had paid USD 50,000 for the shooting rights. His action was hence legal under Zimbabwean law, however he had paid his helpers to use an elephant carcass to lure the lion from a protected area into a hunting concession.

Cecil’s agony lasted for well over twelve hours. The circumstances of this death could later be minutely reconstructed as he was collared and named as part of a research programme. Aside from the inhumane aspect of Cecil’s unnecessarily painful death due to the inexpert use of bow and arrow, his killing caused an uproar. The act of a rich American so nonchalantly shooting an African animal strongly echoed the not so long-gone days of colonialism.

It was, however, under colonial administration that Hwange National Park was established, namely in 1928, when present day Zimbabwe was the British colony Southern Rhodesia. Over the years Hwange has grown in the country’s largest national park, comprising of a variety of landscapes from dense teak and mopane forests to white Kalahari sands and golden savannas. It’s raw and diverse African landscape, as the safari marketing slogan goes. Hwange is also one of the best managed parks in the world, running various research, educational and conservancy projects. It is a place for endangered species to thrive.

The idea behind the park, though, was far from idealistic. First and foremost, a national park promised huge revenues from tourism to the colonial government. Wildlife conservancy was the means, a fringe benefit. But it was much more than a collateral damage that the establishment of the national park led to the near extinction of a people that like the lions had roamed the land for millennia; a people that mastered the use of bow and arrow, and who were able to turn themselves into lions: the Tjwao, the bushmen of Zimbabwe.

Sunset over Hangwe

If not physically, then legally, a National Park is a fenced-off area. The aim is not to lock in the wilderness, but to keep the rest of the world out, so the land appears pristine and raw, untouched by human hand: a glimpse of the world as God had created it. However, the land between the Zambezi river in the North, the train tracks to Victoria Falls in the East, and the Kalahari desert in the South-West, is by no means untouched by human hand.

In 1889, Queen Victoria of England authorized the adventurer Cecil Rhodes to economically explore and subsequently administer the lands North of the British Cape Colony. By this time, 35 year-old Cecil was already a diamond magnate, having made his fortune in South Africa. Now he showed great interest in the teak forests, as teak was a sturdy wood needed for the building of fast growing railroad tracks through Africa, as well as in the ivory urgently needed to quench the high demand of upright pianos in the US; Also, the land was rich in coal, another resource the west needed to fire the steam engines of the ongoing industrial revolution promised . He set out immediately.

Kudu in the Mopane forest

First, he tricked the local Madebele – a belligerent Bantu tribe that had settled in this region for generations – into granting them the rights to the natural resources. The naturally illiterate Madebele signed the British contracts, foolishly trusting the oral promises of the Rhodes’ agents. Then, under the pretext of hence broken promises, his rifle-savvy British South Africa Company battled them in the First Madebele War, which resulted in the Africans’ defeat. Subsequently, he consigned the Madebele as workers to build a railroad to connect the teak forests in the South with the coal mines in the North. Rhodes meant business indeed.

By the time of his early death, in 1902, the teak forests were cleared to the extent that they wouldn’t regenerate on their own, and the sandy soil wasn’t fit for agriculture, or husbandry, due to the Tsetse fly. On top, not only were the elephants starkly decimated, but all wildlife had been hunted to near extinction. The British considered hunting a noble sport, and killed predators as vermin, and kudus and giraffes and impalas as trophies. To reserve the remaining game for themselves, and for lack of better use of the sandy and dry soil, they turned the area into a private Game Reserve.

Cave painting in Mapotos NP

The Tjwao bushmen had foraged and hunted in these dry and sandy lands since the beginning of humankind, as archaeological evidence from the Old Stone Age suggests. Their life style, as that of other San (Bushmen) groups all over Southern Africa, was in complete harmony with nature. Their diet consisted primarily of foraged berries and roots, their game hunts were ritualized hunts that lasted for days on end – or longer. Their settlements were temporary, which enabled them to follow migrating game, as well as the rains. This flexibility was a valuable asset in a region so close to the Kalahari desert, a land prone to droughts and climate uncertainty. In their nomadism, they left no traces, no evidence of their presence. aside from carvings and cave paintings. They were invisible, blending into their surrounding.

Most fascinating about the Tjwao and other bushmen cultures though, was their understanding of the relationship between the natural world and themselves. They lived in the truest sense of the word inseparable from nature. All the landscape around them was considered alive, every boulder, every animal once was a human creature, or was inhabited by the spirits of the dead, or those yet to be born. Should the need arise, the Tjwao were also able to turn themselves into animals, into a kudu if they hunted one, or into an ostrich, or a lion.


“My aunt turned herself into a lioness. She sought for us, as she wanted to see whether we were still comfortable where we lived. She, when she had smelt our houses’ scent, she passed in front of us, she roared like a lioness because she wished that we should hear her, that it was she who had come seeking for us.” (from “Stories that float from afar” Ancestral Folklore of the San of Southern Africa)

The Tjwao lived outside the confinements of time and their own physical bodies, but immersed into their land, their identities inseparable from the natural world around them.

young lioness – Cecil’s granddaughter


By the turn of the 20th century, when the white settlers and Cecil Rhodes arrived, Tjwao families lived in scattered groups in what is now Hwange National Park. As Rhodes’ administration claimed the land, they relocated the locals to so-called Native Reserves. This was done on the legal basis of the Game and Fish Preservation Act of 1929. The British blamed the Tjwao for “poaching,” and the sudden loss of wildlife, which of course was irrational, given that the Tjwao had lived in these lands for thousands of years without decimating the wild animals, nor the trees. Rather, Cecil Rhodes had a hidden agenda; he considered the natives barbarians and thought that the sooner the Anglo Saxons subjugated the governed the continent, the better for the human race. It was, he said, their obligation. In a letter from 1888 he wrote:

“I contend that we are the first race in the world, and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. I contend that every acre added to our territory means the birth of more of the English race who otherwise would not be brought into existence.”

Although not the world’s first National Park, Hangwe was hence the first to evict indigenous inhabitants.

In the years to follow the expulsion, during the liberation struggle and after declaration of independence of the state of Zimbabwe, in 1980, the situation for the Tjwao didn’t improve. As a people who didn’t fit in with neither the Bantu societies, let alone the imperialistic Europeans, they were caught in the middle, victims of violence by the hands of the colonial forces as well as, post 1980, by the red berets, the notoriously brutal Zimbabwe Military Police. They were also victims of cultural ghosting. Unrecognized as an indigenous people, in the native reserves, their history and their culture were forgotten. Their homesteads in the Tholotso district south of Hwange National Park is the poorest district of Zimbabwe, their political representation not worth mentioning, their income the lowest in Zimbabwe due to their low literacy rate and lack of higher education.

The Tjwao language, which has no writing, is destined to die out, spoken by only a handful of people of advanced age. The young, who have never been to Hwange National Park, don’t understand it. They mostly speak Ndebele, the prevailing language in the region, and dream of a different future, where their children at least get better education and can find a better life, in Zimbabwe or abroad.

Only the old still dream of returning to their ancestors’ land, where their forefathers lay buried, the land that defined them as a people, and as persons. They still feel the phantom pain from missing the land from which they were once inseparable. To venture into the National Park, even only for foraging for their traditional foods (hunting is out of question within the confines of the park), they need to apply for a license, a bureaucratic obstacle they mostly fail, or are too scared too attempt, or are denied anyway.

Today, the number of Tjwao living in the homesteads surrounding Hwange is estimated to be around 1500 people. There are fewer Tjwao in Africa, than there are lions.

Mopane worm – traditional Tjwao food


Lions are an endangered species, as are wild dogs and cheetahs and giraffes, who all live in large numbers in Hwange National Park. In its wildlife conservation efforts of Hwange National Park is laudable. Situated in a dry region that has no rivers and waterbodies, the park management has since the 1930s installed 103 boreholes, first run by wind wheels, then by diesel generators and presently by solar power, to provide the large mammals with water. Without these artificial waterholes, the many large animals, and with them the lions and other predators, would have long died. This concerns especially the elephants, whose population has exploded since the establishment of the park, from ca. 1,500 elephants in 1920 to ca. 45,000 in 2020.


The sight of many playfully entangled trumps, of happy baby elephants as they splash in the waters against the tangerine African sunset is enlightening to the eyes of the paying visitor – affluent Americans and Europeans. The sparkling reflection of the sunbeams on the solar panels does not diminish their joy. Nor does the presence of rangers managing the waterholes or patrolling for poachers. For these licensed rangers, who are highly skilled in tracking and nature conservation, the National Park is not simply a job, or an income, but their love for wild life is evident – and contagious. Hangwe is not the raw African landscape as the marketing slogan goes; it is land carefully managed and lovingly cared for. As it was before it became a National Park, and before Cecil Rhodes ever set foot on the land that is holy to the Tjwao.

That Tjwao aren’t back to the land that complements them in their identity, that their lives have not been cared for, but falsely sacrificed for the lives of lions and elephants, is incomprehensible; it’s another wrong doing of Cecil Rhodes that should be righted before it’s too late, before their culture has vanished into oblivion.

Unlike his namesake, Cecil the lion was an old man at the time of his death. In the run of his long life he had fathered many new generations. His wives, his daughters and sons, and even his grandchildren are the lions that today hunt in Hangwe National Park and who carry with them the spirits of Africa, of those passed, of those yet to be born.

The United Nations: From National to Global Park

An young elephant dies in Zimbabwe during the drought of 2019

When the UN Convention on Biological Diversity ended last week, a pledge was made: By 2030, thirty percent of the world’s water and land shall be turned into protected areas. This comes as a final attempt to stop the alarming loss of species worldwide (30% to 50% of known species are estimated to go extinct in the next few decades), and thereby save the one species that’s dearest to our hearts: the human species.

A lonely Eurasian kingfisher. Last of his kind Austria.

The idea of setting aside parts of the world to let them regenerate from human influence goes back to the late American biologist E.O. Wilson, who, in his book Half Earth demanded fifty percent of the world to be turned into protected areas in order for our ecosystem and us to survive. Thirty percent appears a realistic interim goal – given that currently a rough 17% are already under protection. This downsized goal plus the highly alluring image of having a third of our planet restored into pure, pristine nature, in other words a Garden Eden as our front yard, should find acclaim from all sides. Yet, it doesn’t. Most surprisingly, the Thirty by Thirty-goal was met with resistance from the representatives of indigenous people.

Why doesn’t the idea of doubling the amount national parks worldwide appeal to those whose lives seem most immersed in nature? To understand their sceptisim, the discussion of environmental protection cannot be led in bio-geographical terms only, but conservation must be addressed against the background of imperialism and racial discrimination. Maybe it’s time to tackle the most fundamental questions: why in order to save our own habitat it needs to be protected from us, and who we, the human species, really are.

Dubbed by the New York Times “the most important global meeting you haven’t heard of”, the Convention on Biodiversity didn’t get much media coverage, unlike its sister, the UN climate convention which drew an international Who Is Who to Glasgow this year. Yet, in impact and urgency the loss of biodiversity equals the climate catastrophe. A functioning ecosystem is crucial to meeting the single goal defined at the climate convention this year: a maximum global warming of 1.5C of pre-industrial levels.

Danube swamps in Austria are under threat due to excessive floor sealing.

Nature is an intricate network of interacting species living in complex habitats. In this recicprocal system called biodiversity, everything is equally important, a field hamster weighs in as much as a bison or a ladybird. The eleven bird species that got declared irreversibly extinct in 2021 alone – among them the beautiful ivory-billed woodbecker and the spectacular Hawaiin Kauai O’o – are eleven more dropped stitches in a once tight fabric called our eco-system.

No species and no individual can survive on its own: Tiny birds morph into giant celestial creatures, little fish clean humpback whales, and savanna plants rely on elephants and migrating mammals to spread their seeds, and cherry trees on bees. Collaboration between species is as crucial to our ecosystem as competition –even in the most competitive field of all: mating, as ornithologist Richard O. Prum in his new interpretation of Darwin’s teachings proved.

Wild Carneolean honey-bees are endangered, as is the Alpine rose, growing exclusively in highest altitudes.

We might not be aware of it, staring at the screens of our phones in our air-conditioned apartment, but we are still embedded in a network of living creatures. Forgotten, that until as few as fifty years ago it was field hamsters that held mice in check, and wolves the grazing deer. Forgotten the birds of Venice whose morning songs inspired Antonio Vivaldi to his Four Seasons, and a falling apple Newton’s law of gravity. Forgotten that it was birds who emboldened Leonardo to engeneer the first flying machines, and bats taught us echolocation, and termites how to ventilate multi-story buildings.

After 10,000 years of agriculture, and almost 250 years since the industrial revolution and industrialized farming, our technoligized lives still depend on the lives of honey bees and other insects, who pollinate 87% of the worlds’ plants. We still rely on elephants to keep planting the trees that store our CO2, and on trees to prevent the soil from eroding and the wind from growing into a hurricane, and the evening tide into a tsunami.

The physical and emotional distance from our own beginnings in the African savannah, this rift we have created between what we call nature and culture, has made it nearly impossible to raise awareness to the extent and urgency of the impending disaster. Species conservation is still regarded a first world problem, a thesis for ornithologists, a post-doc research-grant maybe, and not a question of survival. Because it’s hard to imagine our immense ecosystem collapsing because of the loss of a tiny creature like a honey bee, while we are flying to Mars.

A glimpse of eternity. Snails evolved 350 million years ago. Their shells are endlessly fascinating, spirally coiled and chiral.

For two weeks, representatives of governments, NGOs, and ethnic tribes convened in Geneva, tackling in specialized assemblies each of the main contributors to the loss of biodiversity: agriculture and food systems, climate change, invasive species, pollution, and unsustainable production and consumption. They came up with twenty-one different targets to be rediscussed in China, when they will meet again this year. The one catchy concept of 30 by 30 was concocted in 2020 already at that year’s Convention, but since none of the targets set in 2020 have since been reached, the pledge simply was repeated. However, things were moved a step farther this time by addressing the question of where these protected areas are to be established.

Since loss of biodiversity is, like anything else, not equally distributed on this planet, a Map of Life was designed to pinpoint the most promising regions: those who still offer the greatest abundance of species, like the rainforests of the Amazonas and the Congo basin, or the mopane forests of Namibia. Little surprisingly, Tokyo, New York, or London were not on the map. In short, for the lives of bankers to remain unchanged, the world’s indigenous people should give up their hunting grounds, most likely their settlements; for sure their culture, life styles, their livelihoods. Not again.

Fishermen at the Kilombero River in Tanzania, their mokoro carved from a local sausage tree.

In his seminal book “Ecology and Equity” (1991) the Indian writer and historian Ramachandra Guha called indigenous tribes who live in rural subsistence-communities the eco-system people. Submerged in their environment they are the planet’s top conservationists. While they make up only 5% of the world population, or 476 million people, they share their homes with 80% of the species (according to IPBES

“Europe has long lost their wildlife, has founded its wealth on exploitation,“ an indigenous representative in Geneva was quoted. “What alternatives do they offer us, if we cannot continue living from our lands?” 

History has taught indigenous tribes to be apprehensive of National Parks. Before Yellowstone National Park, the world’s first National Park, was established in 1872 it had been home to various Native American tribes for more than 10,000 years. They had hunted, fished, and gathered plants in what to European settlers appeared untouched nature. When the German colonialists turned the Etosha-pan in nowadays Namibia into a game reserve in 1907, they expelled the native Hai//om people. To this day the Hai//om live at the outskirts of Etosha National Park in impoverished townships, having to pay admission fee to enter the park.

Wattled Cranes in Botswana, near extinct.

The Concept of the National Park rests on the romantic ideal of nature as untouched by civilization. Whenever colonialists entered unchartered land, they took the absence of fields or permanent structures as a sign of desolation, failing to recognize the sustainable life style of the native people. A nomadic lifestyle like that of the Khoisan in Southern Africa, or the Native American tribes was an unimaginable impossibility. What was perceived as natural or untouched was in fact vernacular landscape: sites filled with meaning, memories and spirituality for the locals. Indigenous culture was overlooked. This first form of ghosting – the silencing, blocking out, the active un-imagining of a group, a tribe, a minority – is what historically predates expulsions when ever land was usurped: to build dams, train tracks, industrial plants, or, if nature was deemed sufficiently beautiful, National Parks.

In the late 19thcentury two kinds of reserves simultaneously came into existence: Game reserves were established to protect wildlife for the use (hunting) or pleasure of a single privileged group, and Native Reserves to push indigenous people out of the way, and out of sight. Private or company-owned wildlife or nature reserves were often turned into National Parks in the late 19th and early 20th century, at a time of rising international nationalism and nation building. The romantic Zeitgeist of the time, instilled with the writings of Goethe or Thoreau, bestowed qualities on nature which should reflect the nation: pure and God-given, resilient, strong and graceful, as Jane Carruthers highlighted in her history of the Kruger National Park:

National parks fulfil an important cultural function in that they are the tangible embodiment of those elements of the natural environment which citizens consider worthy of state protection. … Thus a national park is not merely a physical entity, a geographical area, or a suite of ecosystems and species, but a mirror of society and a vigorous symbol.

Nationalpark Hohe Tauern in Austria. Sublime nature as representation of an idealized nation. The high Alpes are among the most threatened ecosystems on the planet due to climate change.

The history of the world’s second oldest national Park, the Kruger in South Africa, serves as a prime example of how the establishment of a national park often disguised imperialistic, economic, and racist goals.

Kruger Nationalpark, in the Northeastern corner of nowadays South Africa, is situated in a region inhabited by the nomadic Khoisan since the Stone Age, and by sedentary Bantu tribes since the Iron Age. When the European settlers, the Vortrekkers, and the British colonialists arrived in the 19th century, the area was abundant with wildlife. Due to the novel use of firearms, the Vortrekker’s growing need of meat, and the British lust for hunting, animals were killed to near extinction.

Blue Roller, once abundant, is now extinct in Western Europe. It’s Eastern European cousin migrates to South Africa and back each year.

Game reserves were hence established by the administration to protect and manage the remaining herds of antilopes. Contrary to the Vortrekkers, the British didn’t hunt for sustenance. Rather, hunting was regarded a noble, elistist sport, and sport hunting as the only morally acceptable form of killing wildlife. It was in this vein that predators like lions, hyenas, wild dogs, or leopards were destroyed as vermin. Their killing was even rewarded by local administration. As predators, they were competitors to the British sportsmen.

The African residents were either evicted from the game reserve to Native reserves, or made to pay rent. Officially, this happened to protect the wildlife from sustenance hunters – the Africans and the poor Afrikaaners. In reality, their impact on the reduction of wildlife was minor. Rather, they were deprived from their livelihoods as the diamond mines and agricultural plants of the emerging nation were in dire need of cheap workforce.

Persona non grata – animalium non gratum. After excessive hunting, the once abundant painted wolf or wild dog is now a threatened species. Less than 5,000 Painted Wolves are left worldwide.

When, in 1926, shortly after the foundation of the Afrikaaner Union of South Africa, the Kruger National Park was established by merging two private game reserves, it was in a spirit of nascent Afrikaaner nationalism. The National park was a tool to promote and romanticize the Vortrekker heritage: the land as it was when the Vortrekker arrived, and the dangers they had to overcome, voracious lions and ferocious buffaloes. With the creation of a national myth, the white population of South Africa was to be glued into a nation, one valiant, heroic people which the wildlife represented. While the rest of the country was industrialized, filled with dumps from the diamond miles, and flattened for endless fruit plants, inside the electrified fences that surrounded the Kruger, a Garden Eden was preserved. Pristine nature as God had created was to serve the spiritual regeneration of paying visitors. The Africans were fenced out, made into Un-inhabitants of South Africa.

The Waldrapp, extinct from overhunting in the 18th century, was bred at the Vienna Zoo and reintroduced into its Alpine habitat.

From an indigenous point of view, national parks, in South Africa and elsewhere, were not established to conserve, but to destroy: their livelihood, their tradition, their culture. Naturally, and politically, we have come a long way. The days of apartheid and racial segregation are long gone, and National Parks have indeed become refuges for conservation and protection, for scientific research and reintroduction programs. As tourism hot spots they employ well trained rangers, thereby offering perspective, job opportunities and ensuing wealth to the surrounding communities. Yet, inside the African National Parks, the old imperialist ideas have often survived. Game Lodges cater to affluent tourists from Europe or the US, conjuring up the once glorious past with colonial style tents and candlelight dinners under the Milky Way, and solemn African waiters that discreetly withdraw into the night. The African townships dwellers never get to see a rhinoceros, a lion, or an elephant. Their habitat is the overcrowded cities.

Children playing in downtown Johannesburg, 2015

Ramachandra Guha, who minced the term eco-system people, also had a name for us, the Westerners: omnivores. We are the wealthy consumers who overstrain the planet. Insatiably, we eat everything. In lack of competitors, we have thrown the ecosystem off balance. Like an unstoppable comet, we are causing the planet’s 6th extinction.

It is not humanity, human kind, from whom the nature needs to be protected, fenced off in National Parks, but the omnivores: Jeff Bezos and wanna-be Jeff Bezos of this planet. We urgently need the ecosystem people to protect us, and our planet.

In this sense it is important to redefine the concept of a nationalpark as a region protected from human exploitation, but not devoid of humans. A space to live in, not an entertainment park for the wealthy. If thirty or fifty percent of the world are turned into protected areas, they must be returned to the eco-system people for them to hunt and fish, to fertilize the soil with controlled fires, to grow their traditional vegetables, to thank and venerate their Earth Gods and spirits. And thereby, hopefully, they will teach us, or refresh our memories of how to live enmeshed in a network of collaborating species, how not to exploit but to give and take, to become the ecosystem people we once were. Then no part of the world will need to be protected, but the planet will be our habitat again. A place for all of us, fellow species and ethnicities.

The Okavango Delta, the world’s largest wetlands is under threat from oil drilling by the Canadian ReckonAfrica